ALASKA'S decision to end 35 years of participation in the PBA as one of its most successful teams has sparked speculation on the fate of the franchise.
Will the team be sold lock, stock and barrel? Will the league take over the sale of the franchise? Or will the players be dispersed among the remaining teams?
Lots of questions right now, but what the league has made certain for now is that Alaska has been given until the end of the season to find a buyer beforethe PBA Commissioner's Office is tasked to step in and oversee the sale.
Any takeover or sale will dictate the fate of the players. If the franchise is sold lock, stock and barrel, all of Alaska's assets from players to draft picks will go to the new owner; in the event of a franchise sale, the players will be distributed in a dispersal draft.
Over the years, most of the younger franchises have entered the league by acquiring an existing franchise, namely Rain or Shine (bought Shell in 2006), Phoenix (bought Barako Bull in 2016), NorthPort (Powerade), Meralco (Sta. Lucia), and NLEX (Air21).
Most companies interested in joining the PBA have favored this route over the acquisition of expansion franchises, which were last made available to Ever Bilena Corp. (Blackwater) and Columbian (Terrafirma) in 2014.
[See How hard is it to buy a new PBA franchise? Go ask ROS and Phoenix]
Probably part of the reason is that existing franchises not only come cheaper (old franchises, insiders say, may be available at less than the P100 million price tag for new ones) but also offers existing assets like players and draft picks.
That is especially true for Alaska, which has young players who except for Jeron Teng and two others, have expiring contracts, therefore giving the new owner flexibility, as well as two first-round draft picks in the next rookie draft.
Tempting, right?
However, any company that makes a bid to buy the Alaska franchise, either through a deal with the company or brokered by the league, will have to go through a stringent process before being officially accepted as a new PBA member team.
First, the buyer will have to undergo due diligence from league-appointed auditors who will be tasked to determine if it has the financial capability not just to buy the team but also to maintain a PBA ballclub long term (insiders bare annual expenses including salaries can go as much as P100 million).
"Open books 'yan," said Commissioner Willie Marcial.
If the potential buyer passes that scrutiny, the company will still need a two-thirds vote from the board to become a new member. That means representatives of eight of the 12 member teams must vote you in (insiders bared it used to be 2/3 vote from the board for expansion members and 3/4 for buyers of existing franchises, but Marcial said only a 2/3 vote is needed by any company that buys the Alaska franchise).
[See How much to PBA players make in salary and bonuses]
In most cases in the past, a potential buyer also has to comply with additional conditions put up by the board, which, for example, mandated expansion sides Blackwater and Columbian to post a bond reportedly worth P100M which would've been forfeited if they decided to discontinue their participation in the first five years.
The path figures to be harder for a company like BAVI, which has been very active in the basketball scene under the Chooks to Go banner, because of the 'lockout clause' that gives a PBA member team the right to veto the application of a direct competitor.
A check with the league showed the lockout provision still exists, although it has been waived in the past in the case of Tanduay (which entered the league in 1999 even if San Miguel is a direct competitor) and Phoenix, which was blocked in 2011 by Petron but cleared in 2016 after Petron reverted to San Miguel Beer.
Will Chooks to Go, if ever, get the same exemption?
Don't bet on it.
Get more of the latest sports news & updates on SPIN.ph
NOTICE ON UNAUTHORIZED AND UNLAWFUL USE, PUBLICATION, AND/OR DISSEMINATION OF SPIN.PH CONTENT: Please be notified that any unauthorized and unlawful use, publication, and/or dissemination of Spin.ph’s content and/or materials is a direct violation of its legal and exclusive rights to the same, and shall be subject to appropriate legal action/s.